The procedures you outlined work perfect with no issues on 95, 98, NT, 2000, XP or Server 2003.
It appears that most of the readers who posted negative comments about this do not understand the benefits of what your post was about in a corporate infrastructure. If they are programmers and can't figure out the issues they were experiencing then they need to go back to the Programmers Guide For Idiots.
At first saight it looks like spam. When you read it you understand it's a spam, and when you click on that web reference left there below the article you exclaim: "F...ing spam, why did I even bother reading this?"
CodeGuru-s, you ain't gurus anymore, if you allow this happenning. Think of renaming into SpamGuru.
1) There is nothing (NOT A SINGLE LINE) of code stablishes
your credit. Everything about this software has been around for more then 7/8 years now. More over, usually the idea of a patent is to prevent compititors from developing a product using same mechanism and techniques. With all do respect sir, you are STEALING peoples developed code to get your own patent !!!!
2) FYI, I agree with the technical comment made by "NOBODY" earlier.
SuperChargerTM Boosts Browsing Speeds Up To 3,000 Times Faster? - some advertizing, but here not buyers place, and not much that this one phrase, but
Code supplied, not trivial - explanation -also: not a bad things.
Why not to try to make helpfull effect to readers -
as main criteria of applicable article?
no one said why character of author is bad concretely?
TM -symbol using ? as said someone.
Make a text with that symbols smaller - it is not need there
but sad for people.