There's a trend in our society for people to use so-called infographics to convey information as though it is scientifically accurate. They usually display statistical information along with leading statements such as "Developers suffered another 31 years..."
However, in many cases these are spurious arguments, supported with unreliable statistics that were produced via biased methods by organizations with vested interests. It's a layered approach that tries to lend the impression of scientific accuracy and the aura of cutesy marketing glitz to cause the audience to believe that they'll quickly and easily benefit by taking some approach (and the consequent purchase of certain products or services to do so).
This one gives me that impression.
No surprise there - most "programmers" are mediocre or incompetent
Posted by Larry
on 11/14/2012 05:20am
While nobody knows what the exact $ impact is, one thing I do know for sure is that by any reasonable standard, most programmers are lousy at what they do. Substandard work is the norm in our field, and most programmers would fail a competency test. This is the cause of most bugs, but unfortunately there are no easy solutions. A licensing system to practice software professionally might help mitigate some of the problem (to what extent is anyone's guess), but that won't be happening any time soon. For now, companies should do everything in their power to carefully screen the developers they hire. Most don't and they suffer the financial consequences. Good developers may be hard to find, but once you do, the financial savings are enormous.