Overriding vs. overloading

Bruce Eckel's Thinking in Java Contents | Prev | Next

//: WindError.java 
// Accidentally changing the interface
 
class NoteX {
  public static final int
    MIDDLE_C = 0, C_SHARP = 1, C_FLAT = 2;
}
 
class InstrumentX {
  public void play(int NoteX) {
    System.out.println("InstrumentX.play()");
  }
}
 
class WindX extends InstrumentX {
  // OOPS! Changes the method interface:
  public void play(NoteX n) {
    System.out.println("WindX.play(NoteX n)");
  }
}
 
public class WindError {
  public static void tune(InstrumentX i) {
    // ...
    i.play(NoteX.MIDDLE_C);
  }
  public static void main(String[] args) {
    WindX flute = new WindX();
    tune(flute); // Not the desired behavior!
  }
} ///:~ 

There’s another confusing aspect thrown in here. In InstrumentX, the play( ) method takes an int that has the identifier NoteX. That is, even though NoteX is a class name, it can also be used as an identifier without complaint. But in WindX, play( ) takes a NoteX handle that has an identifier n. (Although you could even say play(NoteX NoteX) without an error.) Thus it appears that the programmer intended to override play( ) but mistyped the method a bit. The compiler, however, assumed that an overload and not an override was intended. Note that if you follow the standard Java naming convention, the argument identifier would be noteX, which would distinguish it from the class name.

In tune, the InstrumentX i is sent the play( ) message, with one of NoteX’s members ( MIDDLE_C) as an argument. Since NoteX contains int definitions, this means that the int version of the now-overloaded play( ) method is called, and since that has not been overridden the base-class version is used.

The output is:

InstrumentX.play()

This certainly doesn’t appear to be a polymorphic method call. Once you understand what’s happening, you can fix the problem fairly easily, but imagine how difficult it might be to find the bug if it’s buried in a program of significant size.



Comments

  • There are no comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Leave a Comment
  • Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.

Top White Papers and Webcasts

  • Following an IT incident through to resolution is more than just acknowledging an alert and restarting a server. The recent State of On-Call Report found that it takes most companies an average of 10-30 minutes to resolve an incident with an average of 5 people involved. Imagine how much money and time companies are spending to deal with incident resolution. But what if you had a tool that offered solutions baked in? Or a tool that sent alerts to the right person or team every time? These are the kind of …

  • IT is rapidly moving to a more dynamic, services-based model in response to businesses' growing demand for faster creation and delivery of services to end customers. A consequence of this move is the emergence of hybrid IT organizations that can improve on-site data center asset utilization while leveraging cloud-based assets to extend services and capabilities. IDC asserts that controlling data flow in a hybrid IT environment is crucial for businesses to effectively transform themselves into data-driven …

Most Popular Programming Stories

More for Developers

RSS Feeds

Thanks for your registration, follow us on our social networks to keep up-to-date