Merold
June 19th, 2001, 06:59 AM
When starting a lot of executables as a single process from a Windows 2000 service,
my machine is getting problems, once the number of processes started simultaneously
reaches about 20 processes and more. The system should be powerfull enough to handle
the processes, since all processes can be started, if you start them using a 3 second delay
after each single process. The Windows system comes up with an error message, that
the application could not be initialized (application pop-up). Is there a limitation to the
number of processes that can be started simultaneously? Would it make sense, to implement
the processes as threads of one base process instead of running many different processes?
my machine is getting problems, once the number of processes started simultaneously
reaches about 20 processes and more. The system should be powerfull enough to handle
the processes, since all processes can be started, if you start them using a 3 second delay
after each single process. The Windows system comes up with an error message, that
the application could not be initialized (application pop-up). Is there a limitation to the
number of processes that can be started simultaneously? Would it make sense, to implement
the processes as threads of one base process instead of running many different processes?