I4i versus Microsoft, Round 2

Remember the case in which Microsoft was said to pay more than US$240 million in damages, because of infringing a patent owned by I4i?, well this is now round 2. The U.S. Federal Court of Appeals affirmed its original decision on Wednesday

During the trial ( before the first appeal ), I4i said that Microsoft had needed a way to handle so-called "custom" XML, and had represented the smaller company as its "partner" -- that is, until it decided to develop its own custom XML editing capabilities within Word 2003. Even though Microsoft knew that i4i held a patent on the technology, Microsoft, went ahead and added the capability into Word without telling i4i.

The first appeal required Microsoft to pay more than US$240 million in damages, and most importantly - which is basically Microsoft's main problem, because surely it cannot be the "small" amount of money - remove the feature in Word 2003 and 2007

Much of the latest decision is identical to the December document, except for an expanded explanation of the three-judge panel's decision to uphold the "willfulness" issue.

"A reasonable jury could have concluded that Microsoft 'willfully' infringed the '449 patent based on the evidence presented at trial," the judges wrote. The decision pointed to evidence presented at the trial showing that Microsoft employees attended demonstrations of i4i software and received i4i sales kits that identified the software as patented technology. This piece of evidence and others imply that Microsoft was aware of the i4i patent, the decision says.

The U.S. Federal Court of Appeals has once again upheld a jury's verdict that Microsoft willfully infringed on patents awarded to i4i.

View Article



Comments

  • There are no comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Leave a Comment
  • Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.

Top White Papers and Webcasts

  • Not long ago, the biggest concern when considering moving workloads to the cloud was security. Today, the main obstacle to cloud adoption is different but familiar: the pain of migrating data. But, migrating data doesn't have to be painful. Purpose-built tools enable efficient data migration without downtime or the risks for data loss. This eBook summarizes the major pain points for IT pros tasked with performing migrations, breaks down the flaws in traditional approaches, and illustrates how modern tools help …

  • You know that visibility is critical to security. You simply can't secure what you can't see. Read this Gartner research note to learn why visibility through a continuous adaptive risk and trust assessment (CARTA) approach is key to securing digital business. Download now to learn eight ways this approach can be deployed to optimize the visibility into your organization's cloud services, mobile endpoints, and digital ecosystems.

Most Popular Programming Stories

More for Developers

RSS Feeds

Thanks for your registration, follow us on our social networks to keep up-to-date