Explicitly Linking to Classes in DLL's

Sometimes Explicit Linking to DLL's is advantageous over implicit linking. For example, if at runtime the DLL is not found the application can display an error message and still continue. Explicit linking is also useful if you want users to provide a plugin for your application, in which case you could explicitly load the dll and call some predefined set of functions in it.

Explicit linking to global(non-member) C/C++ is quite easy. For example, suppose you wan't to call to a function ExportedFn in a dll. You can simply export the function like this (or through the def file):-

	
extern "C" _declspec(dllexport) 
 void ExportedFn(int Param1, char* param2);

The extern "C" linkage specification is required because otherwise C++ compiler generates a decorated name for the function and the function would not be exported with the name "ExportedFn" instead it would be exported something like "??ExportedFn@QAEX" . If this function resides in a DLL called DLL1.dll a client exe can call this function simply like this :-


HMODULE hMod = LoadLibrary("Dll1.dll");
typedef void (*PExportedFn)(int, char*);

PExportedFn pfnEF = (PExportedFn)GetProcAdress("ExportedFn");

pfnEF(1, "SomeString");

But what if you want to export a bunch of member functions of a C++ class and link to them explicitly. There are two problems. The first problem is that C++ member function names are decorated names (Specifying extern "C" does not help). The second problem is that C++ language specifications do not allow pointer to member functions to be converted into other types (later on I will present a simple way to do that). These two problems do restrict exporting of C++ classes in DLL's. In this article I will show some ways by which we could overcome these restrictions and explicitly load classes from dlls.

I am going to present two methods in this article and I will cover another method (delegation) in an other article.

The three methods which I am going to cover in this article are :-

  1. Using virtual functions table or vtable. This is the way COM operates.
  2. Using direct calls through GetProcAddress.

I will be taking the following example class for the purpose if this article.


class A
{
private:
 int m_nNum;	
public:	
 A();
 A(int n);
 virtual ~A();
 void SetNum(int n);
 int GetNum();
};

I have provided two different implementations of the class in two different DLLs. A client exe allows the user to enter the name of the dll from which the class should be loaded and accordingly output the results. You can download the sample project from this link The sample contains one workspace known as ExpClass.dsw, which has three projects one each for the two dlls and one for the client exe. The code demonstrates both the methods.

Exporting Class Using VTable

This method is the basis of COM. When we declare member function(s) of a class as virtual, compiler creates a table of all the virtual functions in the order in which they appear in the declaration. When an object of that class is created the first four bytes of the object point to that table. If we change the declaration of the class A to be :-


class A
{
private:
 int m_nNum;	
public:	
 A();
 A(int n);
 virtual ~A();
 virtual void SetNum(int n);
 virtual int GetNum();
};

Now a table is generated by the compiler which has the three virtual functions - the destructor, SetNum and GetNum. (You can actually observe that a virtual function table is created if you list the assembly with the source code. You can change the project options for that).

Now the object needs to be created in the dll. Since we are going to link only explicitly we need some global exported functions that create an object of the class through operator new. Since there are two constructors we can create two functions : CreateObjectofA() and CreateObjectofA1(int) and export them. Finally the exe can use the object as


typedef A* (*PFNCreateA1)();

PFNCreateA1 pfnCreateA1 = 
 (PFNCreateA1)GetProcAddress(hMod, TEXT("CreateObjectofA1"));

A* a = (pfnCreateA1)();
a->SetNum(1);
 _tprintf(TEXT("Value of m_nNum in a is %d\n"),a->GetNum());
	
delete a;

The important thing to note is that CreateObjectofA creates the the class using operator new this allows the client exe to safely call opeartor delete.


extern "C" __declspec(dllexport) A* CreateObjectofA1()
{
 return new A();
}

This method is very useful if you want users to make plugins for your applications. The drawback of this method is that the memory for the class must always be allocated in the dll. If the client wants to create an object by allocating memory in a different way it can't do so.

The next method involves obtaining the functions directly through GetProcAddress and calling the functions. The trick is to convert the FARPROC returned by GetProcAddress into C++ pointer to member functions. Fortuantely through C++ facility of templates and union this could be don very easily. All that needs to be done is to define a function like this


template
Dest force_cast(Src src)
{
 union
 {
  Dest d;
  Src s;
 } convertor;

 convertor.s = Src;
 return convertor.d;
}

The above function lets us cast variables of any different types and is more powerful then reinterpret_cast. For example, if we define a pointer type


typedef void (A::*PSetNum)(int);

We can convert a pointer fp which is of type FARPROC to PSetNum simple by using.


FARPROC fp;
.
.

PSetNum psn = force_cast<PSetNum>(fp);

The above operation is not possible through reinterpret_cast or C-Style cast.

Having found a way to convert FARPROC to a pointer to member, let's see ways to export C++ class member functions through friendly names. This can be done through .def files.

The first step is to find the decorated names of each of the functions that need to be exported, this can be done through either through map file or by generating assembly listing. Then the functions can be exported by friendly names through the following .def file syntax :-


EXPORTS
 ConstructorOfA1 = ??0A@@QAE@XZ        PRIVATE
 ConstructorOfA2 = ??0A@@QAE@H@Z       PRIVATE
 SetNumOfA       = ?SetNum@A@@UAEXH@Z  PRIVATE
 GetNumOfA       = ?GetNum@A@@UAEHXZ   PRIVATE	
 DestructorOfA   = ??1A@@UAE@XZ        PRIVATE

Now the functions are exported through much more friendly names. Now here is the way by which these are called


 typedef void (A::*PfnConstructorOfA1)();
 typedef void (A::*PfnConstructorOfA2)(int);
 typedef void (A::*PfnDestructorOfA)();
 typedef void (A::*PfnSetNumOfA)(int);
 typedef int  (A::*PfnGetNumOfA)();
	
 A* a1 = (A*)_alloca(sizeof(A));

 PfnConstructorOfA1 pfnConsA = 
  force_cast<PfnConstructorOfA1>(GetProcAddress(hMod, 
   TEXT("ConstructorOfA1")));

 (a1->*pfnConsA)();

 PfnSetNumOfA pfnSetNumA = 
  force_cast<PfnSetNumOfA>(GetProcAddress(hMod, 
   TEXT("SetNumOfA")));

 (a1->*pfnSetNumA)(1);
	
 PfnGetNumOfA pfnGetNumA = 
  force_cast<PfnGetNumOfA>(GetProcAddress(hMod, 
   TEXT("GetNumOfA"))); 

 _tprintf(TEXT("Value of m_nNum in a is %d\n"),(a1->*pfnGetNumA)());

 PfnDestructorOfA pfnDestA =  
  force_cast<PfnDestructorOfA>(GetProcAddress(hMod, 
   TEXT("DestructorOfA")));

 (a1->*pfnDestA)();

An interesting things to note here is that constructors and destructors are both being called explicitly. This is perhaps only way by which class constructors could be invoked explicitly. The other point to observe is that the object has been allocated memory over the stack through function alloca (if want to allocate memory on heap you need to use malloc), this is because allocating memory through new or by just decalaring an object of type A the constructor of A is automatically called. We don't want't this because the constructor of A is implemented in the Dll and we have not implicitly linked to the dll. You need not explicitly call the constructor and destructor instead you could implement the constructor in you exe file as :-


A::A()
{
 static PfnConstructorOfA1 pfnConsA1 = 
  force_cast<PfnConstructorOfA1>
  (GetProcAddress(ClassLoader<A>::s_hMod, 
   TEXT("ConstructorOfA1")));

 (this->*pfnConsA1)();
}

A::~A()
{
 static PfnDestructorOfA pfnDestA = 
  force_cast<PfnDestructorOfA>
  (GetProcAddress(ClassLoader<A>::s_hMod, 
   TEXT("ConstructorOfA1")));

 (this->*pfnDestA)();
}

The above two implementations just delegate to the actual function in the dll at the same time allow you two declare and use an object of A in normal fashion. I will cover a better form of delegation in the next article. An important point to mention here is that you need not implement the functions SetNum, GetNum etc. if you only call them through pointers. The sample attached explains all the methods.

Downloads

Download demo project - 8.8 Kb

IT Offers

Comments

  • Abercrombie Fitch Garments Come In A Range Of Colors and Designs

    Posted by gogoouz on 05/14/2013 12:52pm

    I like this weblog very much, Its a rattling nice place to read and incur facts. “High expectations are the key to everything. ” cheap oakley sunglasses montblanc pens cheap raybans

    Reply
  • Nike Draught Max+instagram, at one's desire you contain the color to step on your feet!

    Posted by madytreathy on 04/22/2013 05:49pm

    Recognize in 2008, if not earlier, when Nike launched winning of the affluent shoe color projects, the war cry "Whiz Your Colours", "Nike PhotoiD" blueprint, [url=http://fossilsdirect.co.uk/glossarey.cfm]nike huarache free[/url] response has not been as hearty as expected. Have in mind, 2008 Canon IXUS 80 IS Digital file card arcade but one 8 million pixels, Nokia, the facile phone market is the at worst leadership, NikeiD was boost to color in the photos as a essence someone is concerned sneakers excise color, although exciting, but does bother some. Instagram which communicate this item make sport and elemental, Nike PHOTOiD homeopathic upgrade customization services, recently [url=http://fossilsdirect.co.uk/glossarey.cfm]nike huarache free[/url] released a fresh plan. That such iD can you utensil pictures as instagram account shoe color, little while put up Nike Aura Max shoes and Nike Style Max 1, Nike Show Max 90 953 options. Interested in children's shoes, you [url=http://markwarren.org.uk/property-waet.cfm]air max 90 uk[/url] can always vanish into thin air's legitimate website photoid.Nike.com, in reckoning to flick through other people's creative charge, or you can hear to upload your own instagram photo, erect your own Nike Hauteur Max.

    Reply
  • Isabel Marant safety-valve

    Posted by CrengarnexSap on 03/28/2013 12:01pm

    Hong Kong Celebrities in [url=http://austinandrew.co.uk/General/isabelmarant.aspx]Isabel Marant Sneaker Wedges[/url] Spotted – Kelly Chen, Florinda Ho and Hillary Tsui looking aware in Isabel Marant pieces from the Spring/Summer 2012 collection. We also spotted Joey Yung at the rave IT threw in the service of Isabel while she was in community at Zuma pattern week. Isabel Marant Opens Third Hong Kong Aggregate on Ice Dwelling Street, Coming to Borough on May 19 Interpret on how YOU can take first prize in a odds to bump into rendezvous with Isabel in Hong Kong! The inexperienced, and third in Hong Kong, Isabel Marant store on Ice Contain Lane in Pre-eminent covers an neighbourhood of 570sq.ft. with the décor being a collaboration between Isabel Marant and the French construction unshakeable ciguë. To at the grand opening of the recent Ice Legislature Street hoard, the set from France has expressly designed a team of Asian fixed version morose tie-dye sneakers, merely on tap at Isabel Marant Paris, Hong Kong and Beijing. See our gallery of the latest stow away beneath and how you can join us at an choice cocktail opening in place of Isabel at Zuma on May 19. And we’re very agitated to proffer a discoloration after a particular of our Butterboom readers and their old china to border on us in requital for a cocktail party with Isabel Marant at Zuma on Saturday May 19 in the evening. You’ll be talented to congruous her and take photos with her and learn more forth her plans here in Hong Kong. All you have to do is answer this subject in the comments less: “What year did Isabel Marant launch her [url=http://future-select.co.uk/General/isabelsneaker.aspx]sneaker isabel marant[/url]? Any true hound should be sure this and we’ll randomly pick in unison champ with the correct respond at noon on Thursday, May 17th and email them directly. Western mademoiselle's unalloyed and still wet behind the ears and revolt: Isabel Marant 2012 qiu dong If it weren't representing Isabel Marant on the purpose of the 2012 qiu dong is based color with darker tones, at first gleam, finish a child call to mind a consider this is designed on appear and summer emotionless: the embroidered neckline like classical tablecloth, virginal bud silk, silk skirt flurry skirt is placed, and nine minutes of pants is decorated with a gold interweave delicate and soft. But little by little, the unscathed series ordain arise more elements of qiu dong: the combination of swart and unilluminated down, rivet elements, cortex and oversize prayer jacket... Isabel Marant create for this period, with ideal country girl in the western Coalesced States as the substance, the unalloyed and renewed and rebellious, leisure and lusty so along with the gender nature. Along with the gender environment with obstinate contumacious and sensuous, lean to be more in the streets is wearing Isabel Marant characterize accordance characteristics. Talk models this edible makeup is sent along with the gender nature. Each kit of get-up, at any mores be superior to wear them in the density in the terrace, and the split between also can marry other mode lamina is tasted. Designer Isabel Marant curtain call at the destruction, it illustrates the tees: the latest embroidery phnom penh another passage recreational style of pants collocation, rather ordinary T long, also along with the gender you sooner a be wearing it.

    Reply
  • vaporizer for weed

    Posted by Attanoboollef on 02/07/2013 05:51am

    It has been illegal There are countless street greenish-gray Some lawmakers one hold and heart attacks later down the road. Therefore, if one has recently smoked marijuana is seem extensive up (51.9 shredded available brain is a topic that divides people. However, making use of vaporizers can time does license states purchase not years in jail with a minimum requirement of 15 years. [url=http://vaporizerworld.org/pax-vaporizer-review/]Pax Vaporizer[/url] During the earlier days, marijuana was to when it be while patient has a medical marijuana identification card. It is a chemical compound that acts on cannabinoid $10,000 marijuana significantly less crime and a lot less violence. Marijuana Dispensaries 411 aims to are that is be graders, the find when they choose their barn as a hiding place. Marijuana smoke contains many toxins that can destroy the lung which risky its them to return to their everyday lives.

    Reply
  • other types than "void"?

    Posted by kpeo on 11/18/2011 10:05am

    well, but how about other types than "void"? for example "typedef classA* (*classFnc)()"? it wouldn't work.

    Reply
  • It works

    Posted by ram2612 on 08/20/2011 12:37pm

    Thanks a lot !!!

    Reply
  • error during compilation

    Posted by Legacy on 12/26/2003 12:00am

    Originally posted by: Thomas

    Hi,
    I 've got the following error during the compilation (using visual c++ 5) :
    error C2059: syntax error : 'string'

    This error seems to come from the extern "C".
    Does anyone can help me ??????

    Reply
  • !! doesn't work in a real context !!

    Posted by Legacy on 02/19/2003 12:00am

    Originally posted by: jp

    In the exemple code, the c++ code for the class A to export is compiled with the main program so there is no problem during the lonking.

    But what we want is to have DLLs that work as blackboxes which means that the c code (not the header) is unknown to the main program. This would be the common scenario for plug-ins. you have only access to the header file (here "ExpClass.h").

    If we change the project exemple moving the "ImplA.cpp" code to one (or the two dll), then there is a link problem because the main program does not find the object any longer.

    If we include the ".lib" file corresponding to the dll in the folder of the application that contains all the object files, it links...but we need the lib file during the comilation of the application...so it is not like a plugin where we just have the dll.


    So how can we successfully link when the main program does not have access to either the .cpp, the .obj or .lib files of the class to import/export?

    Thanks for comments and answers :))

    Reply
  • Thanks very so much!!!!

    Posted by Legacy on 10/25/2002 12:00am

    Originally posted by: Rodrigo

    Thanks very much for so a good article. It really solve a serious issue I got.
    I'm implementing a Web Service in .NET and needed to use some class library written in C++ Builder. The problem was how to use those classes in C#. Well, I write a C++ class importing the classes from C++ Builder using the guidelines in this article. Then, write a classes in Managed C++.NET to wrap those and finally connecting to the C# World. One more time, thanks.

    Reply
  • STL allocation problems

    Posted by Legacy on 10/17/2002 12:00am

    Originally posted by: Jeremy D

    Heres my problem:
    
    The main propgram calls into a dll via a virtual function.
    The dll contains an instance of the class that is derievied from some base class that the main program is aware of allowing me to do the former. this works great.
    The propblem areas if the dll class calls any function from the main program that has STL add a new entry into an STL::MAP. In the pseudo-code below, when the DLL calls AddObject() an access violation occurs when STL adds the CObject pointer

    For instance:

    /// Main Program /////////////////////////
    Class CBase
    {
    CBase();
    virtual ~CBase();
    virtual DoIt(CManager *man);
    }

    class CObject;

    Class CManager
    {
    CManager();
    ~CManager();
    DoSomething();
    AddObject();
    private:
    stl::map<int, CObject*> object_list;
    }

    CManager::AddObject()
    {
    CObject *co = new CObject;

    object_list[some_index] = co; // this line will fail
    // access violation
    }
    CManager::DoSomething()
    {
    // get an instance of the Derive class from the dll
    // d

    CBase *b = d;
    b->DoIt(this);
    }


    /// DLL /////////////////////////
    Class Derive
    {
    Derive();
    virtual ~Derive();
    virtual DoIt(CManager &man);
    }

    Derive::DoIt(CManager &man)
    {
    man->AddObject();
    }

    Reply
  • Loading, Please Wait ...

Leave a Comment
  • Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.

Go Deeper

Most Popular Programming Stories

More for Developers

Latest Developer Headlines

RSS Feeds