CString instead of LPCSTR
Environment: VC6 SP4
Well, I've seen other people asking for a class like this, and I sure wanted one, so I finally wrote one.
Suppose you want to call a routine with a dynamically constructed LPCSTR. You would call it like this:
SampleRoutine( (LPCSTR) csFMT(
"Sample dynamic string count(%d) name(%s)",
nAnInteger,
szAZeroTerminatedString));
The Microsoft CString class provides a Format member routine which provides sprintf-type formatting, without the need to allocate a buffer. The class CString automatically calculates the size of the buffer required, and allocates it. A CString variable, however, must first be declared. This routine allows the CString Format member routine to be used, without needing to declare a CString.
Here is the sample code without using the "csFmt" routine:
CString csTemp;
CsTemp.Format("Sample dynamic string count(%d) name(%s)",
nAnInteger, szAZeroTerminatedString);
SampleRoutine((LPCSTR) csTemp);
This method doesn't require any subclassing, and is only a short < 10 line routine.
CString csFMT(LPCSTR lpszFormat, ...)
{
CString csStr;
va_list argList;
va_start(argList, lpszFormat);
csStr.FormatV(lpszFormat, argList);
return csStr;
}
Downloads
You can cut & paste code from above.

Comments
If only Format whould ??
Posted by Legacy on 06/04/2002 12:00amOriginally posted by: Boaz Harrosh
If CString::Format was defined as
CString& AFX_CDECL Format(LPCTSTR lpszFormat, ...);
and not:
void AFX_CDECL Format(LPCTSTR lpszFormat, ...);
than we could just do:
cout << (LPCSTR)CString().Format("%s" ,"yes it works this way") ;
ReplyA constructor is callable in C++. It is just like a type cast.
Another way
Posted by Legacy on 04/17/2002 12:00amOriginally posted by: Mathieu Fr.
Reply