Smart Pointer that supports subclassing

Until now all smart pointer implementations that I have seen didn't support assignment between base and derived class pointers. Here is an implementation that does support it. I give you two implementations of smart pointers:

1) Ptr<T> - This smart pointer assumes that 'T' support reference counting by deriving from IRefCount (which is also supplied).

2) SmartPtr<T> - This smart pointer is more generic than Ptr<T> while not assuming anything about the type 'T'. Being more generic costs having a small reference object created for each referenced object or type.

The following source code demonstrates the use of the two types of smart pointers templates.

#include <string>
#include <iostream>
#include "ptr.h"
#include "smartPtr.h"

using namespace std;

class Object;
class Host;

typedef Ptr<Host>			PHost;
typedef Ptr<Object>			PObject;

class Object : public IRefCount {
	public:
		Object (int id, const string& name) : m_name(name), m_id(id) {};
		const string& GetName () { return m_name; }
	protected:
		string	m_name;
		int		m_id;
};

class Host : public Object {
	public:
		Host (int id, const string& name, const string& hostName):
				m_hostName(hostName), Object (id, name) {};
		
	protected:
		string	m_hostName;
};

// The following two classes do not carry any
// reference counting inteface.
class Base {
	
};

class Derived : public Base {
	
};
	
typedef SmartPtr<Base>		PBase;
typedef SmartPtr<Derived>	PDerived;


void PrintName (PObject pObj)
{
	cout << pObj->GetName() >> endl;
}

// testSmartPtr
//
// demonstrate the SmartPtr<T> template. The
// Base and Derived classes are simple classes
// that don't support any reference counting.
//
void testSmartPtr ()
{	
	PDerived pDerived2;
	PBase pBase;

	PDerived pDerived = new Derived;
	
	// The Ptr<T> supports subclassing
	pBase = pDerived;
	pDerived2 = (PDerived&)pBase;
}

// testPtr
//
// demonstrate the Ptr<T> template. The Ptr<T>
// assumes that the referenced class 'T' supports
// the reference counting interface IRefCount.
//
void testPtr ()
{
	PHost pHost2;

	PHost pHost = new Host (1, "Wks5", "");

	// The Ptr<T> supports subclassing
	PObject pObject = pHost;		  
	pHost2 = (PHost&)pObject;
	PrintName (pHost2);
}

/**************************************************************
 | NAME: main
 **************************************************************/
void main ()
{
	testSmartPtr ();
	testPtr ();
}

Downloads

Download demo project - 6 Kb
Download source - 3 Kb


Comments

  • Trouble in std::list

    Posted by maquanwei on 04/26/2004 10:33pm

    I use this smart-point to a std::list, such as std::list>. When I use list::remove(somePtr), my compile give me a C2593 link error. I had to overide operator "==", but SmartPtr does not support compare between base-class's pointer and sub-class's pointer now. Do you have any suggest?

    Reply
  • No Error - Look more carefully!

    Posted by Legacy on 06/21/2002 12:00am

    Originally posted by: Erez Efrati

    If you just looked more carefully at the source code of the 
    
    template SmartPtr<T> and RefCountRep<T> you would have seen
    that:

    1) RefCountRep<T> is holding a pointer to the actual real
    class, and the following is a piece of the destructor code
    (taken from the SmartPtr.h) :

    template <class T>
    RefCountRep<T>::~RefCountRep ()
    {
    assert (m_count == 0);

    if (m_ptr != 0)
    delete m_ptr;
    }

    template <class T>
    void RefCountRep<T>::ReleaseRef ()
    {
    assert (m_count > 0);

    m_count--;
    if (m_count == 0)
    delete this;
    }


    2) Second and more important is that the whole idea about
    having a RefCountRep<T> template is not having the "real"
    class derive any special base class.

    Hope that answers it,


    Erez

    Reply
  • Error - your destructor in RefCountRep must be virtual

    Posted by Legacy on 12/18/2001 12:00am

    Originally posted by: NMTop40

    In RefCountRep, your destructor must be virtual! (This is serious). Presumably your template smart pointer will contain a class derived from RefCountRep.

    When it calls ReleaseRef() (on mine I call it Release to be consistent with COM, and indeed my smart pointer class can be used with CComObject classes, something CComPtr does not allow) - anyway - ReleaseRef() will call delete this on RefCountRep but if the destructor is not virtual it will not call the real class's destructor and there may be memory leaks if the real class has allocated memory.

    One other small matter - in mine I made the reference count mutable and the AddRef() and Release() functions const. This allows you to have reference counting on const pointers.


    Reply
Leave a Comment
  • Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.

Top White Papers and Webcasts

  • Learn How A Global Entertainment Company Saw a 448% ROI Every business today uses software to manage systems, deliver products, and empower employees to do their jobs. But software inevitably breaks, and when it does, businesses lose money -- in the form of dissatisfied customers, missed SLAs or lost productivity. PagerDuty, an operations performance platform, solves this problem by helping operations engineers and developers more effectively manage and resolve incidents across a company's global operations. …

  • Today's agile organizations pose operations teams with a tremendous challenge: to deploy new releases to production immediately after development and testing is completed. To ensure that applications are deployed successfully, an automatic and transparent process is required. We refer to this process as Zero Touch Deployment™. This white paper reviews two approaches to Zero Touch Deployment--a script-based solution and a release automation platform. The article discusses how each can solve the key …

Most Popular Programming Stories

More for Developers

RSS Feeds