QSort for CStringArray

Environment: Tested on VC5

These three routines can be used to perform a qsort on a CStringArray.  It is a fairly simple hack, but still a hack.  It sure is fast, though.


// first, declare these somewhere
void SortStringArray (CStringArray& ar, BOOL bDescending);
int CompareDescending(const void *a, const void *b);
int CompareAscending(const void *a, const void *b);

// put something in your CString array
  CStringArray bob;
  bob.Add("Are");
  bob.Add("You");
  bob.Add("Talking");
  bob.Add("To");
  bob.Add("Me?");

// sort it
  SortStringArray(bob, TRUE);

// here's the code!

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
int CompareAscending(const void *a, const void *b)
{
  CString *pA = (CString*)a;
  CString *pB = (CString*)b;
  return (pA->Compare(*pB));
}

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
int CompareDescending(const void *a, const void *b)
{
  CString *pA = (CString*)a;
  CString *pB = (CString*)b;
  return (-1 * (pA->Compare(*pB)));
}

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
void SortStringArray (CStringArray& csa, BOOL bDescending)
{
  int iArraySize = csa.GetSize();
  if (iArraySize <= 0)
     return;

  int iCSSize = sizeof (CString*);
  void* pArrayStart = (void *)&csa[0];

  if (bDescending)
     qsort (pArrayStart, iArraySize, iCSSize, CompareDescending);
  else
     qsort (pArrayStart, iArraySize, iCSSize, CompareAscending);
}



Comments

  • Case sensitivity added...

    Posted by Legacy on 01/26/2000 12:00am

    Originally posted by: Troels

    //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
    inline int StringArray_Compare(const void* a, const void* b, BOOL bCaseSensitive)
    {
    LPCTSTR pA = ((CString*)a)->operator LPCTSTR();
    LPCTSTR pB = ((CString*)b)->operator LPCTSTR();
    return bCaseSensitive ? _tcscmp(pA, pB) : _tcsicmp(pA, pB);
    }
    static int __cdecl StringArray_CompareAscending (const void* a, const void* b)
    {
    return StringArray_Compare(a, b, FALSE);
    }
    static int __cdecl StringArray_CompareDescending (const void* a, const void* b)
    {
    return StringArray_Compare(a, b, FALSE) * -1;
    }
    static int __cdecl StringArray_CompareAscending_Case (const void* a, const void* b)
    {
    return StringArray_Compare(a, b, TRUE);
    }
    static int __cdecl StringArray_CompareDescending_Case(const void* a, const void* b)
    {
    return StringArray_Compare(a, b, TRUE) * -1;
    }
    //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
    int StringArray_Sort(CStringArray* pas, BOOL bCaseSensitive, BOOL bAscending)
    {
    const int count = pas->GetSize();
    qsort(pas->GetData(), count, sizeof(CString*),
    bAscending ? (bCaseSensitive ? StringArray_CompareAscending_Case : StringArray_CompareAscending )
    : (bCaseSensitive ? StringArray_CompareDescending_Case : StringArray_CompareDescending));
    return count;
    }
    //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

    Reply
  • 1. Case insensitive sorting and 2. missing parameter error is not an error

    Posted by Legacy on 07/27/1999 12:00am

    Originally posted by: Will Mainwaring

    1.
    
    To sort the array without case considerstions, replace
    "pA->Compare(*pB)" with
    "pA->CompareNoCase(*pB)"

    2.
    The Compare function is not missing parameters, as it is a function pointer. qsort uses elements of the array passed in as void parameters to the Compare...() function.

    The error that this guy has reported is probably due to declaring the 3 functions in his class definition:
    void CMyClass::SortStringArray(...)
    As they are C functions, not C++ functions, you must use:
    void SortStringArray(...)
    Check the help in VC on the "__cdecl" keyword for C -> C++ compatibility.

    Reply
  • Compare function is missing parameters

    Posted by Legacy on 07/07/1999 12:00am

    Originally posted by: Tim Hodgson

    Ex: qsort (pArrayStart, iArraySize, iCSSize, CompareDescending);

    CompareDescending is missing parameters to make this code work.

    Anyone know what should go there?

    Reply
Leave a Comment
  • Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.

Top White Papers and Webcasts

  • Live Event Date: September 10, 2014 @ 11:00 a.m. ET / 8:00 a.m. PT Modern mobile applications connect systems-of-engagement (mobile apps) with systems-of-record (traditional IT) to deliver new and innovative business value. But the lifecycle for development of mobile apps is also new and different. Emerging trends in mobile development call for faster delivery of incremental features, coupled with feedback from the users of the app "in the wild". This loop of continuous delivery and continuous feedback is …

  • Packaged application development teams frequently operate with limited testing environments due to time and labor constraints. By virtualizing the entire application stack, packaged application development teams can deliver business results faster, at higher quality, and with lower risk.

Most Popular Programming Stories

More for Developers

Latest Developer Headlines

RSS Feeds