Simple Numeric Edit Control

-->

In our application we needed several edit controls to accept only numbers. One might think to use the Number option on the resource editor, but unfortunately that did not allow us to enter the "-" minus sign. So we needed a different solution.

We looked at CodeGuru to find a simple MaskEdit control. There were several to choose from but unfortunately they all did much more that we needed, and the cursor movement, backspace and delete were not exactly the same as the standard edit control (which was a requirement). With nothing else to do, we (like so many others other there) simply wrote our own.

It was unbelievably simple. Here are the steps we took:

1: Created a new class using class wizard where the base class was CEdit. 2: Added this handler for WM_CHAR

void MaskEdit::OnChar(UINT nChar, UINT nRepCnt, UINT nFlags)
{
 CString Holder =
  "`~!@#$%^&*()_+|=\\qwertyuiop[]asdfghjkl;'zxcvbnm,./QWERTYUIOP{}ASDFGHJKL:/\"
  "ZXCVBNM<>/";

 if(Holder.Find(nChar)!=-1)
  return;

 CEdit::OnChar(nChar, nRepCnt, nFlags);
}

That's it. No it does not check for every possibility in the world, but it does exactly what we needed. It allows us to have an edit control that works exactly like the default, but only allows numbers and the "-" sign. There is probably a more elegant way we could have done this, but this was fast, and it worked.



Comments

Leave a Comment
  • Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.

Top White Papers and Webcasts

  • 2015 is shaping up to include some of the best innovation the mobile industry has ever experienced. There will be new discoveries, new technologies, and existing giants in the vendor space will test the limits to increase productivity while ensuring the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data. While all of this innovation is taking place, enterprises must continue to remain vigilant as cybercriminals continue to look for weaknesses to steal company data, and intellectual property by infiltrating …

  • Traditional approaches to application modernization, either manual rewrite or auto-migration tools, have been proven time and again as inefficient. Rewrite needs scarce dev skills, is slow, risky and costly; auto-migration is what Verccio Dale of Gartner defines as "a pig with a lipstick, is still a pig." Are there alternatives? Find out, download this short practical guide now!

Most Popular Programming Stories

More for Developers

RSS Feeds

Thanks for your registration, follow us on our social networks to keep up-to-date