Multiple/Single Selection ListBox Control

I find it quite irritating that one cannot change the style of a CListBox from single to multiple and back dynamically. After plenty of searching the most common solution I found was to place two ListBox controls, one set to Single selection and the other to multiple. The user then populates the two with the same data and does the hide and show dance as required. This is too frustrating.

The SRListBox class is implemented by taking a multiple selection listbox that can be made to behave like a single select listbox. In the single select mode I simply unselect any other selections made. The SRListBox provides the user with a function ( SetSingleSelect(const bool& single) ) to toggle between single and multiple selection.

In addition to this simple implementation I added and array of class SRCBAndLBItemArray. This class simply holds pointers to all items currently selected. This saves me having to go through the painful routine of repeating the code below each time I need my selections.

	int numberSelected = GetSelCount();
	if (numberSelected>0) 
	{
		int *selIndex = new int[numberSelected];
		GetSelItems( numberSelected, selIndex );
		for (int i=0; i < numberSelected; i++) 
		{
			blah....
		}
	}

The SRCBAndLBItemArray gets populated each time the SRListBox::UpdateData() function gets called (perhaps I should have given this function another name). I call this function from the DoDataExchange(CDataExchange* pDX) function of parent window and from the OnSelectionChange message handler. (this is key, without it the SRCBAndLBItemArray does not get populated). Perhaps someone can suggest a better mechanism.

The CListBoxExDlg::OnSelchangeList1() function in the sample code displays the use of the SRListBox data retrieval.

Download demo project - 27 KB



Comments

  • Simpler Solution!?

    Posted by Legacy on 05/04/1999 12:00am

    Originally posted by: Bryan C. Smith

    I too am building an app which requires dynamic listbox selection changing.  However, I did not go into the
    depth that was done here.  I simply handled the LBN_SELCHANGE message notification and put all my logic
    within it.  Here's some sample source:
    
    

    if (m_bSingleSelectMode)
    {
    int cSelItems = m_wndMSLB.GetSelCount();
    if (cSelItems > 1)
    {
    int nSkipItem = m_wndMSLB.GetCaretIndex();
    if (nSkipItem >= 0)
    {
    int* rgSelElems = new int[cSelItems];
    ASSERT(rgSelElems);
    m_wndMSLB.GetSelItems(cSelItems, rgSelElems);

    for (int i = 0; i < cSelItems; ++i)
    {
    m_wndMSLB.SetSel(rgSelElems[i], rgSelElems[i] == nSkipItem ? TRUE : FALSE);
    }

    delete[] rgSelElems; rgSelElems = NULL;
    }
    }
    }

    This seems to do the trick, however a little more thought would be necessary to allow only 2 selections at a time as another person posed in an earlier comment. I don't think it would be overly difficult though.

    Reply
  • Limit Multiple Listbox to 2 selections?

    Posted by Legacy on 01/19/1999 12:00am

    Originally posted by: Ryan Hayle

    I am trying to figure out if this is possible. I see I could use your implementation, and just unselect everything after the second selection, but there must be a better way.

    Thanks,
    Ryan Hayle
    <ryan@savvynet.com>

    Reply
Leave a Comment
  • Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.

Top White Papers and Webcasts

  • Intelligent N+X Redundancy, Placement Affinities, & Future Proofing in the Virtualized Data Center Virtualization brought about the ability to simplify business continuity management in IT. Workload portability and data replication capabilities mean that physical infrastructure failures no longer need impact application services, and they can rapidly be recovered even in the event of complete site failure. However, Enterprises and Service Providers face new challenges ensuring they have enough compute …

  • Live Event Date: July 8, 2015 @ 2:00 p.m. ET / 11:00 a.m. PT With business driving the increasing adoption of agile methodologies such as Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment, the need for agile database tooling has become even more important. In many companies, the database development lifecycle has become the bottleneck in an otherwise agile delivery process. As such, database professionals are under increasing pressure to shorten delivery timelines even further, only increasing the stakes …

Most Popular Programming Stories

More for Developers

RSS Feeds

Thanks for your registration, follow us on our social networks to keep up-to-date